The new Hitler

"“Europe is George Soros’ gas chamber,” Szilard Demeter, ministerial commissioner and head of the Petofi Literary Museum in Budapest, wrote in an opinion Saturday in the pro-government Origo media outlet. “Poison gas flows from the capsule of a multicultural open society, which is deadly to the European way of life,”" reports AP.

Szilard later reportedly retracted the published text, because the Jews felt offended that someone dared use Holocaust to present as victims Europeans instead of the Jews well within the context. I didn't see the Jews protest when Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan compared the state of Europe's Muslims with the persecution of Jew before WW2.

I found the archived version of the original text in Hungarian, but here's an excerpt from Google Translate:

The Liberals now want to exclude Poles and Hungarians from the political community of which we still have rights as members. We are the new Jews. Whether it is called an open society, or the rule of law, or solidarity, verbal crooks all serve as tools of disenfranchisement. When they question the will and ability of the Hungarian electorate to choose how they want to live, who they want to see in power, they are actually told that we have a big nose, we stink and we are lice.

They are considered inferior "beings." Believe me, this is practically what they think of the whole of Central and Eastern Europe, of every nation in Europe.

The otherwise classic superior colonial behavior is headed by a misty utopia. Because the situation is no better in the West, the liberals also have their own struggle: the fainted cult of otherness aims at not being yourself. They will cross anyone who they cannot carve into a multicultural person. Sounds better than Übermensch, but essentially the same.

George Soros is the liberal Führer. And his liberal army deifies in a more servile way than anno Hitler on his own.

They learned nothing in the XX. century.

Truth be told, Szilard is rather mild. His point about the Poles and Hungarians being the new Jews of Europe is not something new. Neither is the view of the Western liberal elites in any way mischaracterised in regards to the people of Central and Eastern Europe (these are former Communist countries). Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Janša even published a book called "First-Class Citizens - A System For the False Elite" where he describes the plight of 2nd class citizens, the ones that are forced to leave their countries, and find work in the West Europe.

The sense of injustice when it comes to the EU member states from Central, Eastern or even Southeastern Europe is real. The sense that they are perceived only as parasites who are only there for money is not misplaced.

And the money is the real problem here. EU started as an economic union. Currently it's trying to be an ideological one, end goal being a political union. The problem is, that not all EU member states can agree on what kind of ideological union it should be. Hungary and Poland for example, want a Christian Europe. Germany and Sweden, a liberal one. Conflict is inevitable. And that's just trying to agree on ideology. United States of Europe on the other hand? Not likely. They'd have to throw either Austria or Germany out of EU for starters.

But lets talk about money. At a meeting of Special European Council (leaders of EU member states) held between 17th and 21st July 2020 EU leaders agreed on a a recovery package and the 2021-2027 budget. After much negotiations it was thought a compromise was struck between the the faction that wanted more money, and the faction that wanted to pay less money. I'll let you guess which is which.

Not long after, EU Parliament, and EU Council decided to take a shit on that hard-brokered deal (all member states have to agree, or there is no deal), and introduced provisions about so called "rule of law" which would serve as grounds for withholding already allocated financial funds to the EU member state that is found guilty of violating "rule of law".

The problem with the new proposal is twofold. First, the EU member states didn't approve it at the meeting in July. Second, it is all BUT the rule of law. Common sense dictates, if you are found guilty of not respecting the rule of law, that would mean, that you are violating some laws. But in EU case that is not so. Common sense also dictates that only judiciary can rule on the rule of law, as otherwise that is not a legal decision, but a political one, something both Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki, and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán stressed multiple times.

Here things get interesting.

On the 16th of November 2020 Hungary and Poland vetoed the new bill, as it is the only sensible thing to do, when they're threatening to cut your money because of ideological differences, and all hell broke loose in Brussels.

On the 17th of November Slovenian Prime Minister Janša wrote to leaders of EU and member states calling for a compromise. The letter wasn't meant for the public, but the liberal journos got their hands on it, and started their media offensive.

On the 18th of November 2020 George Soros published his own op-ed at Project Syndicate, a website he himself partly finances, called "Europe Must Stand Up to Hungary and Poland", where he demanded od EU not to "compromise on the rule-of-law provisions it applies to the funds it allocates to member states," and warned that "How the EU responds to the challenge to those provisions now posed by Hungary and Poland will determine whether it survives as an open society true to the values upon which it was founded."

Project Syndicate refused to publish Orbán's response to Soros.

And then on 20th of November 2020, as if on queue to prove the point Hungary and Poland were trying to make, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatović voiced her concerns about Hungarian's attempts to enshrine the protection of children in their constitution:

"I fear that several proposals contained in the complex legislative package, submitted without prior consultation and relating to matters including the functioning of the judiciary, election law, national human rights structures, scrutiny over public funds, and the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) people, could serve to undermine democracy, the rule of law and human rights in Hungary."

This is what Hungarians were trying to put in Constitution:

"Hungary protects the institution of marriage, which is based on a consensual union between a woman and a man, and protects the family as the basis on which the nation can survive. The basis of relationships within a family is marriage, as well as the relationship between parents and children. The father is a man, the mother is a woman."

This is an ideological war. Protecting the institution of marriage, stating that a father is a man, and the mother a woman is according to EU high rep undermining the rule of law in Hungary.

Szilard not only said it right, but he was fully justified in doing so. Soros is the blight on Europe, and wherever his money shows up, problems follow. Rainbow revolutions abound. As Orbán put it in his response to Soros on 25th of November:

"We in the eastern part of the EU know very well what it means to be free. The history of the nations of Central Europe has been a relentless struggle for freedom against great empires, a repeated battle to win our right to decide our own destinies. We have bitter first-hand experience that every imperial endeavor brings enslavement. There are still quite a few here from the generation of freedom fighters – in the former Eastern Bloc, from Estonia to Slovenia, from Dresden to Sofia – who can personally remember what it is like to oppose tyranny, the rule of man and its communist version: intimidation, material and moral ruination, physical and mental abuse. We want no more of that. 

Western leaders who have lived their whole lives in a world of inherited freedom and the rule of law should now listen to those who have fought for freedom and who – based on their personal life experiences – can distinguish between the rule of law and tyranny, or the rule of man. Such Western leaders must accept that in the 21st century we shall not surrender the freedom we fought to achieve at the end of the 20th century.

The battle for and against the new Brussels empire has not yet been decided. Brussels seems to be surrendering, but many nation states continue to resist. If we want to preserve our freedom, Europe must not succumb to the Soros network."